Comparison of change in average mathematics scores from 2003 to 2005 in the official NAEP reported sample and the full population estimates, grade 8: By state
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| State/jurisdiction |
Reported |
Full population estimates (FPE) | Difference (reported minus FPE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 0.3 | 0.7 | -0.4 | |||
| Alaska | -0.1 | -0.8 | 0.7 | |||
| Arizona | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | |||
| Arkansas | 5.9 | * | 5.0 | * | 0.9 | |
| California | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 | |||
| Colorado1 | -2.6 | -3.3 | * | 0.7 | ||
| Connecticut | -2.7 | -2.1 | -0.6 | |||
| Delaware | 3.8 | * | 3.4 | * | 0.3 | |
| District of Columbia 1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | * | -0.5 | ||
| Florida | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.3 | |||
| Georgia | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.2 | |||
| Hawaii | -0.1 | 0.5 | -0.6 | |||
| Idaho | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | |||
| Illinois | 0.5 | 1.0 | -0.5 | |||
| Indiana | 0.5 | -0.3 | 0.8 | |||
| Iowa | -0.1 | -0.6 | 0.4 | |||
| Kansas | -0.2 | -0.8 | 0.6 | |||
| Kentucky | -0.3 | 0.2 | -0.4 | |||
| Louisiana | 1.4 | 1.8 | -0.4 | |||
| Maine | -0.8 | -1.9 | 1.0 | |||
| Maryland | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||
| Massachusetts | 5.0 | * | 3.2 | * | 1.8 | |
| Michigan | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | |||
| Minnesota | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.3 | |||
| Mississippi | 1.5 | 2.5 | -1.0 | |||
| Missouri | -2.3 | -2.4 | 0.1 | |||
| Montana | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||
| Nebraska 1 | 1.8 | 3.0 | * | -1.2 | ||
| Nevada | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | |||
| New Hampshire | -0.9 | -0.4 | -0.5 | |||
| New Jersey | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.7 | |||
| New Mexico | 0.0 | -0.7 | 0.7 | |||
| New York | 0.0 | 0.4 | -0.5 | |||
| North Carolina | 0.6 | 0.7 | -0.1 | |||
| North Dakota | -0.2 | -1.4 | 1.2 | |||
| Ohio | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | |||
| Oklahoma | -0.5 | -1.9 | 1.3 | |||
| Oregon | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | |||
| Pennsylvania | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |||
| Rhode Island | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | |||
| South Carolina | 3.9 | * | 4.3 | * | -0.4 | |
| South Dakota 1 | 2.4 | * | 1.9 | 0.5 | ||
| Tennessee | 2.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | |||
| Texas | 4.1 | * | 3.9 | * | 0.1 | |
| Utah | -1.5 | -1.6 | 0.1 | |||
| Vermont | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | |||
| Virginia | 2.7 | 3.0 | -0.3 | |||
| Washington | 3.9 | * | 3.5 | * | 0.4 | |
| West Virginia | -1.7 | -2.0 | 0.3 | |||
| Wisconsin | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |||
| Wyoming | -1.4 | -1.6 | 0.2 | |||
|
DoDEA2 |
-0.9 | -1.1 | 0.3 | |||
| * Statistically significant change. | ||||||
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different under the scenario. | ||||||
| 2 Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). | ||||||
| SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Mathematics Assessments. | ||||||
Read more about the potential effects of exclusion rates on assessment results.